Opinion · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Barry v. United States
95 S. Ct. 1561
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 1975-04-14
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- roving police officers shook down bars that did not pay up
- “significant disproportionality in minority employment, coupled with even minimal proof of a higher minority failure rate [on selection exams]” establishes prima facie claim
- Eleventh Amendment does not immunize state civil service officials from being taxed for costs
- one-to-one hiring quota to remedy unlawful discrimination and eradicate its effects
- state legislator violates Hobbs Act when payments to defendant induced by exploitation of victim's reasonable belief that defendant's position as state senator provided him with effective control over state leases
- minorities awarded hiring preference to ameliorate the effects of past discrimination
- there must be a fit between the qualifications and the job
- cut off score of 70 on a test is arbitrary
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Barry v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 157 opinions
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.