Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Stahl v. Redcay
591 Pa. 704
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 2007-02-28
- Topic
- intellectual-property-and-technology
How later courts describe this case
- stating: "To the contrary, any person choosing to represent himself in a legal proceeding must, to a reasonable extent, assume that his lack of expertise and legal training will be his undoing"
- stating civil contempt paired with sanctions constitutes final, appealable order
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Stahl v. Redcay. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 39 opinions
MICHELLE STAHL AND JAMES STAHL, AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF HEAVEN LEE ANGEL STAHL, A MINOR AND MICHELLE STAHL AND JAMES STAHL, HUSBAND AND WIFE IN THEIR OWN RIGHT
v.
JULIA REDCAY, D.O., AND OB/GYN ASSOCIATES OF LEWISBURG AND MICHAEL BADOWSKI, ESQUIRE
MICHELLE STAHL AND JAMES STAHL, AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF HEAVEN LEE ANGEL STAHL, A MINOR AND MICHELLE STAHL AND JAMES STAHL, HUSBAND AND WIFE IN THEIR OWN RIGHT
v.
EVANGELICAL HOSPITAL AND JAMES V. MCDONALD, M.D. AND LEWISBURG PEDIATRICS
PETITION OF: MICHELLE STAHL AND JAMES STAHL.
No. 446 MAL 2006.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District.
February 28, 2007.ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.