Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Sheridan v. HORN & HARDART BAK. CO.

366 Pa. 485

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania
Date
1951-01-02
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • finding defendant had no notice of the conditions and plaintiff was contributorily negligent in negligence claim for slip and fall in wet, slushy revolving door of restaurant
  • nonsuit affirmed where no evidence, apart from description of general weather conditions, of how long wet and slushy condition of entryway had existed
  • plaintiff walked on freshly-mopped floor

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sheridan v. HORN & HARDART BAK. CO.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
23 opinions
366 Pa. 485 (1951)

Sheridan, Appellant,
v.
Horn & Hardart Baking Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued November 13, 1950. January 2, 1951.

*486 Before DREW, C.J., STEARNE, JONES, LADNER and CHIDSEY, JJ.

*488 Conrad G. Moffett, with him George T. Guarnieri, for appellant.

John J. McDevitt, 3rd, with him Peter P. Liebert, 3rd, for appellee.

OPINION PER CURIAM, January 2, 1951:

Order affirmed on the opinion of the learned court below.