Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Richmond v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance
Richmond v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins., 821 A.2d 1246 (Pa. 2003)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 2003-04-25
- Topic
- general
Kristin RICHMOND, Appellee v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 7, 2003. Decided April 25, 2003.
Citator
Richmond v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance is no longer good law, at least in part: overruled by Commonwealth v. Pagan (2008). 13 later decisions cite it, 2 of them negatively.
- Authority status
- negative
- Cited by
- 13 opinions
- Negative treatment
- 2 citing opinions
Kristin RICHMOND, Appellee v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued April 7, 2003.
Decided April 25, 2003.
Charles W. Craven, Philadelphia, for Prudential Property and Cas. Ins. Co., Appellant.
David Gerald Knerr, Michael J. Piosa, Allentown, for Kristin Richmond, Appellee.
Matthew Stephen Crosby, Scott B. Cooper, Harrisburg, for PA Trial Lawyers Ass’n, Appellee Amicus Curiae.
Before CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and LAMB, JJ.
ORDER
Remanded to Superior Court for consideration in light of Prudential v. Colbert, 813 A.2d 747 (Pa.2002). Jurisdiction relinquished.