Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Anonymous Attorney

Off. of Disciplinary Counsel v. Anonymous Att’y, 759 A.2d 372 (Pa. 2000)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Date: 2000-09-27
Topic: general

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. ANONYMOUS ATTORNEY, Respondent. No. 449 Disciplinary Docket No. 3. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Sept. 27, 2000.

Citator

Cited by: 26 opinions

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. ANONYMOUS ATTORNEY, Respondent.

No. 449 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 27, 2000.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2000, it is ordered that the charges docketed at No. 22 DB 1998 be dismissed.

Justice NIGRO files a dissenting statement.

NIGRO, Justice,

Dissenting.

I dissent because I find that there was clear and sufficient evidence to establish that Respondent committed numerous violations of Rule of Professional Conduct 1.1.