Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Anonymous Attorney

Off. of Disciplinary Counsel v. Anonymous Att’y, 759 A.2d 372 (Pa. 2000)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania
Date
2000-09-27
Topic
general

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. ANONYMOUS ATTORNEY, Respondent. No. 449 Disciplinary Docket No. 3. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Sept. 27, 2000.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Anonymous Attorney. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
26 opinions

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. ANONYMOUS ATTORNEY, Respondent.

No. 449 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Sept. 27, 2000.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2000, it is ordered that the charges docketed at No. 22 DB 1998 be dismissed.

Justice NIGRO files a dissenting statement.

NIGRO, Justice,

Dissenting.

I dissent because I find that there was clear and sufficient evidence to establish that Respondent committed numerous violations of Rule of Professional Conduct 1.1.