Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Nachod v. Nachod
402 Pa. 60
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 1960-12-15
- Topic
- international-arbitration
Opinion Per Curiam, This appeal is from an order certifying the suit in equity to the law side of the court. In taking the appeal, the plaintiff relied for authorization upon Section 2 of the Act of June 7, 1907, P. L. 440, 12 PS §1228. But that section of the Act of 1907 has been suspended by Buie 1550(10) of the Pennsylvania Buies of Civil Procedure: Korona v. Bensalem Township, 385 Pa. 283, 284, 122 A. 2d 688.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Nachod v. Nachod. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 10 opinions
Opinion
Per Curiam,This appeal is from an order certifying the suit in equity to the law side of the court. In taking the appeal, the plaintiff relied for authorization upon Section 2 of the Act of June 7, 1907, P. L. 440, 12 PS §1228. But that section of the Act of 1907 has been suspended by Buie 1550(10) of the Pennsylvania Buies of Civil Procedure: Korona v. Bensalem Township, 385 Pa. 283, 284, 122 A. 2d 688. The appeal is, therefore, premature as having been taken from an interlocutory order which has not been made appealable by statute: see Section 4 of the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, 12 PS §675.
Appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.