Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Moyer v. Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc.
11 A.3d 960
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 2011-01-25
- Topic
- general
Charles MOYER and Donna Moyer; Individually and as Personal Representatives of the Estates of Judy and Ronald Moyer; and Leisurecraft, Inc., Petitioners v. TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC., Teledyne Inc., Superior-air Parts, Inc., Piedmont Hawthorne Aviations, Inc. a/k/a Piedmont Aviation Services, Inc., Piedmont/Hawthorne Aviation, Inc., and/or Piedmont Hawthorne Aviation, LLC., and Divco, Inc., Respondents. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Jan. 25, 2011. ORDER PER CURIAM.
Citator
- Cited by
- 29 opinions
- Negative treatment
- 1 citing opinion
Charles MOYER and Donna Moyer; Individually and as Personal Representatives of the Estates of Judy and Ronald Moyer; and Leisurecraft, Inc., Petitioners v. TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC., Teledyne Inc., Superior-air Parts, Inc., Piedmont Hawthorne Aviations, Inc. a/k/a Piedmont Aviation Services, Inc., Piedmont/Hawthorne Aviation, Inc., and/or Piedmont Hawthorne Aviation, LLC., and Divco, Inc., Respondents.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jan. 25, 2011.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the following issue, as stated by Petitioners:
Did the Superior Court improperly afford blanket immunity to manufacturers for negligence and strict liability in their written instructions under GARA’s rolling provision under the guise of fostering a non-existent federal policy to vindicate rights of manufacturers over those of accident victims?
The Application for Leave to File Reply to The Answers of Respondents is hereby denied as moot.
Madame Justice Orie Melvin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.