Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Mikulsky v. Northtec, Inc.
Mikulsky v. Northtec, Inc., 169 A.3d 564 (Pa. 2017)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 2017-06-05
- Topic
- general
Christine MIKULSKY and Stanley Mikulsky, Petitioners v. NORTHTEC, INC. and Estee Lauder, Inc. and Estee Lauder Companies, Inc., Respondents No. 887 MAL 2016 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. June 5, 2017 ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 5th day of June, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mikulsky v. Northtec, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
Christine MIKULSKY and Stanley Mikulsky, Petitioners v. NORTHTEC, INC. and Estee Lauder, Inc. and Estee Lauder Companies, Inc., Respondents
No. 887 MAL 2016
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
June 5, 2017
ORDER
AND NOW, this 5th day of June, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.