Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Matharu v. Muir
Matharu v. Muir, 73 A.3d 576 (Pa. 2013)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 2013-08-22
- Topic
- bankruptcy
ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and this matter is *577REMANDED to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Seebold v. Prison Health Serv., — Pa. -, 57 A.3d 1232 (2012). Petitioners’ Application to Remand this Matter to Superior Court for Reconsideration in Light of Seebold, is DISMISSED as moot. Justice Baer dissents and would deny the allocatur petition as he views Seebold v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Matharu v. Muir. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
ORDER
PER CURIAM.AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and this matter is
Petitioners’ Application to Remand this Matter to Superior Court for Reconsideration in Light of Seebold, is DISMISSED as moot.
Justice Baer dissents and would deny the allocatur petition as he views Seebold v. Prison Health Serv., — Pa. -, 57 A.3d 1232 (2012) as distinguishable from this case.