Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Lynnebrook & Woodbrook Associates v. Borough of Millersville
738 A.2d 993
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 1999-03-29
- Topic
- general
LYNNEBROOK & WOODBROOK ASSOCIATES and Dack Realty Associates, v. BOROUGH OF MILLERSVILLE and Judith L. Landis and John Orlando, Petition of Lynnebrook & Woodbrook Associates, Dack Realty Associates, Judith L. Landis and John Orlando. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Citator
- Cited by
- 30 opinions
LYNNEBROOK & WOODBROOK ASSOCIATES and Dack Realty Associates, v. BOROUGH OF MILLERSVILLE and Judith L. Landis and John Orlando, Petition of Lynnebrook & Woodbrook Associates, Dack Realty Associates, Judith L. Landis and John Orlando.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
March 29, 1999.
David E. Wagenseller, III, Lancaster, for petitioner.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 1999, we GRANT the Petition for Allowance of Appeal LIMITED to the following issues:
Whether the Supreme Court should let stand a decision that allows a developer to use a road on someone else’s property to satisfy subdivision requirements, without even making the owner of that road a party to his subdivision request. Whether the Supreme Court should let stand a decision which contradicts a 1972 decision of the Commonwealth Court regarding who must be joined as a party in a subdivision matter and deprives a property owner of due process by not requiring personal notice.