Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Krull v. Philadelphia
Krull v. Phila., 382 PA 1 (Pa. 1955)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 1955-05-23
- Topic
- commercial
382 Pa. 1 (1955) Krull, Appellant, v. Philadelphia. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued May 3, 1955. May 23, 1955.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Krull v. Philadelphia. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 5 opinions
Krull, Appellant,
v.
Philadelphia.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued May 3, 1955. May 23, 1955.Before STERN, C.J., STEARNE, JONES, BELL, CHIDSEY, MUSMANNO and ARNOLD, JJ.
Thomas Raeburn White, with him Warren D. Mulloy, C.L. Cushmore, Jr. and White, Williams & Scott, for appellants.
*2 Harvey Levin, Deputy to the City Solicitor, and Abraham L. Freedman, City Solicitor, for appellees.
Joseph E. Gold, with him Lenard L. Wolffe, Samuel Smith and Gilbert Stein, for appellee.
Harry F. Stambaugh, Special Counsel, with him Herbert B. Cohen, Attorney General, for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, appellee.
OPINION PER CURIAM, May 23, 1955:
The decree of the court below dismissing the bill of complaint is affirmed at the appellants' costs on the opinion of President Judge KUN, reported at 2 D. & C. 2d 181, which adequately disposed of the matter.