Klusman v. Bucks County Court of Common Pleas

How later courts describe this case

• finding as relevant under 1709 that counsel failed to move promptly for class certification, adhere to court orders, follow court procedure by filing summary judgment before the court had ruled on certification and candidly advise court of class representative’s death
• finding as relevant under Rule 1709 that counsel failed to move promptly for class certification, adhere to court orders, follow court procedure by filing summary judgment before the court had ruled on certification and candidly advise court of class representative’s death
• atypicality “must be clear and must be such that the interests of the class are placed in significant jeopardy”