Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
In re Nakoski
758 A.2d 1155
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 2000-09-28
- Topic
- general
In re Peter Paul NAKOSKI, Jr., District Justice In and For Magisterial District 06-3-01. Appeal of Judicial Conduct Board. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Sept. 28, 2000. ORDER PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2000, the order of the Court of Judicial Discipline is hereby affirmed.
Citator
In re Nakoski is no longer good law, at least in part: overruled by Siekierda v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation (2002). 81 later decisions cite it, 1 of them negatively.
- Authority status
- negative
- Cited by
- 81 opinions
- Negative treatment
- 1 citing opinion
In re Peter Paul NAKOSKI, Jr., District Justice In and For Magisterial District 06-3-01. Appeal of Judicial Conduct Board.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sept. 28, 2000.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2000, the order of the Court of Judicial Discipline is hereby affirmed.