Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Wilgus

989 A.2d 340

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania
Date
2010-02-16
Topic
general

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 16th day of February, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is: Did the courts below err by concluding that a defendant who provides an address and subsequently becomes homeless has no duty to comply with the registration requirements of Megan’s Law, such that evidence consistent with these circumstances would be insufficient to support a verdict of guilty of failure to register? Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Commonwealth v. Wilgus. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions
COM. v. WILGUS,605 Pa. 313(2010)
989 A.2d 340
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. William Howard WILGUS,
Respondent.
No. 514 MAL 2009.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District.
February 16, 2010.
Petition for Allowance of Appeal, No. 514 MAL 2009, from the Order of the Superior Court at 1100 MDA 2008, dated June 26, 2009, affirming the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County at CP-22-CR-0002439-2007, dated May 27, 2008.

Prior report: Pa.Super.,975 A.2d 1183.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 16th day of February, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal isGRANTED.The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Did the courts below err by concluding that a defendant who provides an address and subsequently becomes homeless has no duty to comply with the registration requirements of Megan's Law, such that evidence consistent with these circumstances would be insufficient to support a verdict of guilty of failure to register?


Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.Page 314