Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Commonwealth v. Hine
Commonwealth v. Hine, 213 PA 97 (Pa. 1905)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 1905-10-30
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam, The single assignment of error is that the court below abused its discretion in refusing a new trial. There is nothing in the case that justifies such a charge or that even requires discussion. *100The judgment is affirmed and the record remitted that the sentence may be executed in accordance with law. Per Curiam, October 80, 1905 : Rule for new trial under Act of April 22, 1903, P. L. 245, refused.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Commonwealth v. Hine. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 11 opinions
The single assignment of error is that the court below abused its discretion in refusing a new trial. There is nothing in the case that justifies such a charge or that even requires discussion.
October 80, 1905 :
Rule for new trial under Act of April 22, 1903, P. L. 245, refused.