Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Commonwealth v. Boelter
463 Pa. 162
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 1975-10-03
- Topic
- general
*163 OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM. The court being equally divided, appellant’s judgment of sentence is affirmed. JONES, C. J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. EAGEN, O’BRIEN and NIX, JJ., would affirm judgment of sentence.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Commonwealth v. Boelter. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
*163 OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM.The court being equally divided, appellant’s judgment of sentence is affirmed.
JONES, C. J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. EAGEN, O’BRIEN and NIX, JJ., would affirm judgment of sentence. ROBERTS, POMEROY and MANDERINO, JJ., would vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether appellant was denied a speedy trial.