Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Com. v. Green
584 Pa. 692
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 2005-08-17
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- stating Superior Court can accept Anders brief in lieu of Turner/Finley letter, where PCRA counsel seeks to withdraw on PCRA appeal
- stating Superior Court can accept Anders brief in lieu of Turner/Finley letter, where PCRA counsel seeks to withdraw J-S13011-18 on PCRA appeal
- stating Superior Court can accept Anders brief in lieu of Turner/Finley letter, where PCRA counsel seeks to withdraw J-S13001-18 on PCRA appeal
- stating Superior Court will accept Anders brief in lieu of Turner/Finley no-merit letter, where counsel seeks to withdraw on PCRA appeal
- stating Superior Court can accept Anders brief in lieu of Turner/Finley brief, where PCRA counsel seeks to withdraw on appeal
- stating jurisdiction is vested in Superior Court upon filing of timely notice of appeal
- “[B]ecause an Anders brief provides greater protection to the defendant, we may accept an Anders brief in lieu of a Turner/Finley letter.”
- “[A] defendant’s right to allocution is violated only if he was not permitted to speak prior to the docketing of the sentence.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Com. v. Green. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 52 opinions
882 A.2d 477 (2005)
COM. v. GREEN.
No. 1114 MAL (2004).Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
August 17, 2005.Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal denied.