Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Com. v. Garland
590 Pa. 656
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 2006-11-08
- Topic
- general
finding that alleged Brady violation did not -8- J-S24042-22 establish governmental interference exception to the PCRA time-bar where it was “nothing but pure speculation.” | when Appellant fails to plead and prove that his petition meets the requirements of the statutory exceptions to the PCRA’s jurisdictional time-bar, the Supe rior Court and the PCRA court lack jurisdiction to consider substantive claims | “It was within the province of the jury as fact-finder to resolve all issues of credibility, resolve conflicts in evidence, make reasonable inferences from the evidence, believe all, none, or some of the evidence, and ultimately adjudge appellant guilty.”
Citator
- Cited by
- 26 opinions
COM.
v.
GARLAND
No. 211 EAL (2006)
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
November 8, 2006.Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.