Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Com. v. Garland

590 Pa. 656

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania
Date
2006-11-08
Topic
general

finding that alleged Brady violation did not -8- J-S24042-22 establish governmental interference exception to the PCRA time-bar where it was “nothing but pure speculation.” | when Appellant fails to plead and prove that his petition meets the requirements of the statutory exceptions to the PCRA’s jurisdictional time-bar, the Supe rior Court and the PCRA court lack jurisdiction to consider substantive claims | “It was within the province of the jury as fact-finder to resolve all issues of credibility, resolve conflicts in evidence, make reasonable inferences from the evidence, believe all, none, or some of the evidence, and ultimately adjudge appellant guilty.”

Citator

Cited by
26 opinions
911 A.2d 933 (2006)

COM.
v.
GARLAND

No. 211 EAL (2006)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

November 8, 2006.

Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.