Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Artzt v. Artzt

Artzt v. Artzt, 528 PA 275 (Pa. 1991)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania
Date
1991-09-18
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • stating that passage of significant amount of time since entry of custody order necessitates remand for full hearing to reconsider merit of prior order

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Artzt v. Artzt. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions

*276 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this eighteenth day of September, 1991, the PAA at the above-captioned docket number are denied; the Applications to Consolidate Appeals and Emergency Petitions for Extraordinary Relief at Nos. 396 and 508 E.D.AL-LOC.Dkt.1991 are Dismissed as Moot; and the Motion to Quash or Dismiss PAA at No. 577 E.D.ALLOC.Dkt.1991 is Dismissed as Moot.