Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon
Thompson v. Columbia County
59 Or. App. 761
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1982-10-20
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM Assuming, without deciding, that the plaintiffs in this case had standing to contest a sale of surplus property by Columbia County — and we find plaintiffs standing to be doubtful — the trial judge erred in cancelling the deed given by the county in this case. The sole issue was whether the county acted unreasonably. See ORS 275.200; Johnson v. Craddock et al, 228 Or 308, 365 P2d 89 (1961). The undisputed evidence in this case concerning the previous offers to purchase this property establishes that the county did not act unreasonably.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Thompson v. Columbia County. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Assuming, without deciding, that the plaintiffs in this case had standing to contest a sale of surplus property by Columbia County — and we find plaintiffs standing to be doubtful — the trial judge erred in cancelling the deed given by the county in this case. The sole issue was whether the county acted unreasonably. See ORS 275.200; Johnson v. Craddock et al, 228 Or 308, 365 P2d 89 (1961). The undisputed evidence in this case concerning the previous offers to purchase this property establishes that the county did not act unreasonably.
Reversed.