Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon

Sutton v. Public Employes' Retirement Board

74 Or. App. 621

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Date: 1985-07-31
Topic: general

PER CURIAM Petitioners seek judicial review of the Public Employes’ Retirement Board’s order on reconsideration, which cancelled their disability retirement allowances. ORS 237.195(1). Petitioners argue at length about the meaning of the disability retirement allowance statutes, ORS 237.171 et seq. However, under the express findings PERB made, the cancellation of petitioners’ allowances is required by the statutes even as petitioners argue they should be interpreted. They do not challenge the findings.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sutton v. Public Employes' Retirement Board. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PER CURIAM

Petitioners seek judicial review of the Public Employes’ Retirement Board’s order on reconsideration, which cancelled their disability retirement allowances. ORS 237.195(1).

Petitioners argue at length about the meaning of the disability retirement allowance statutes, ORS 237.171 et seq. However, under the express findings PERB made, the cancellation of petitioners’ allowances is required by the statutes even as petitioners argue they should be interpreted. They do not challenge the findings.

Affirmed.