Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon

Strickland v. Maass

Strickland v. Maass, 112 Or. App. 319 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Date: 1992-04-08
Topic: litigation

PER CURIAM Plaintiff seeks habeas corpus relief, contending that his attorney in a post-conviction relief proceeding was ineffective, because he failed to raise ineffective assistance of trial counsel as an issue. The habeas court correctly dismissed the writ for lack of jurisdiction, McClure v. Maass, 110 Or App 119, 821 P2d 1105 (1991), rev den 313 Or 74 (1992), and we affirm. Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Strickland v. Maass. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff seeks habeas corpus relief, contending that his attorney in a post-conviction relief proceeding was ineffective, because he failed to raise ineffective assistance of trial counsel as an issue. The habeas court correctly dismissed the writ for lack of jurisdiction, McClure v. Maass, 110 Or App 119, 821 P2d 1105 (1991), rev den 313 Or 74 (1992), and we affirm.

Affirmed.