Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon
State v. Winkelman
24 Or. App. 317
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1976-02-03
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- court upheld against vagueness challenge statute declaring dog which “disturbs any person by frequent or prolonged noises” to be a public nuisance
- statute that declared a dog that “[disturbs any person by frequent or prolonged noises” is a public nuisance held not to be unconstitutionally vague
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Winkelman. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
PER CURIAM
ORS 609.095(6) reads:
"A dog is a public nuisance if it:
* * *
"(6) Disturbs any person by frequent or prolonged noises * *
The sole issue is whether this statute is unconstitutionally vague. We hold that it is not. State v. Marker, 21 Or App 671, 536 P2d 1273 (1975).
Reversed and remanded.