Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Sullivan

State v. Sullivan, 49 Or. App. 730 (Or. Ct. App. 1980)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Date
1980-12-15
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Defendant appeals his conviction after a jury verdict of possession of a controlled substance. Defendant has failed to set out his claim of error in compliance with Rule 7.19, Oregon Rules of Appellate Procedure. We decline to review the asserted error. Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Sullivan. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction after a jury verdict of possession of a controlled substance. Defendant has failed to set out his claim of error in compliance with Rule 7.19, Oregon Rules of Appellate Procedure. We decline to review the asserted error.

Affirmed.