Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon
State v. Mejia
48 Or. App. 230
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1980-09-15
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM. In this appeal, defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for Robbery in the First Degree and Robbery in the Second Degree. There was sufficient evidence. See State v. Krummacher, 269 Or 125, 523 P2d 1009 (1974).
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Mejia. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
In this appeal, defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for Robbery in the First Degree and Robbery in the Second Degree. There was sufficient evidence. See State v. Krummacher, 269 Or 125, 523 P2d 1009 (1974).
The state does acknowledge, however, that "[i]n light of State v. Perkins, 45 Or App 91, 607 P2d 1202 (1980), decided one day prior to the entry of
Remanded for resentencing.