Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon
State v. Down
122 Or. App. 416
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1993-08-18
- Topic
- litigation
PER CURIAM Defendant was convicted of three counts of robbery in the first degree, ORS 164.415, after he entered into a plea agreement. Defendant appeals, arguing that the court erred in calculating his criminal history. Under ORS 138.222(2)(d), we may not review his claim of error. See State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993); State v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Down. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Defendant was convicted of three counts of robbery in the first degree, ORS 164.415, after he entered into a plea agreement. Defendant appeals, arguing that the court erred in calculating his criminal history. Under ORS 138.222(2)(d), we may not review his claim of error. See State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993); State v. Kilborn, 120 Or App 462, 852 P2d 935 (1993); State v. Johnston, 120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1156 (1993).
Affirmed.