Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Wolfe

94 Or. App. 776

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Date
1989-01-18
Topic
general

PER CURIAM In this proceeding to determine whether a child should be remanded to adult court for prosecution, the trial court found that it would be in the best interests of the child that he be remanded. ORS 419.533(1)(d) authorizes remand only when it is in the best interests of both the child and society. On de novo review, ORS 419.561(4), we conclude that remand in this case does serve the best interests of the child and society. Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Wolfe. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PER CURIAM

In this proceeding to determine whether a child should be remanded to adult court for prosecution, the trial court found that it would be in the best interests of the child that he be remanded. ORS 419.533(1)(d) authorizes remand only when it is in the best interests of both the child and society. On de novo review, ORS 419.561(4), we conclude that remand in this case does serve the best interests of the child and society.

Affirmed.