Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon

Shelby v. Oregon State Penitentiary

96 Or. App. 739

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Date
1989-05-24
Topic
general

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary that found that he had violated two disciplinary rules and imposed, inter alia, a $100 fine. He first contends that there is not sufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty. There is. However, respondent concedes, and we agree, that the fine is invalid. Watson v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Shelby v. Oregon State Penitentiary. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary that found that he had violated two disciplinary rules and imposed, inter alia, a $100 fine. He first contends that there is not sufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty. There is. However, respondent concedes, and we agree, that the fine is invalid. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988). His remaining contentions do not warrant discussion.

Fine vacated; otherwise affirmed.