Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon
In re the Marriage of Mance
64 Or. App. 418
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1983-08-24
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM This is a dissolution of marriage case in which wife appeals those portions of the trial court’s decree which concern spousal support, child support, the property division and attorney fees. Husband cross-appeals with respect to the property division and attorney fees. We affirm all aspects of the decree save for that concerning spousal support; we agree with wife that her permanent spousal support should be increased. Accordingly, the first sentence of paragraph 9 of the decree is amended to read: “9. Petitioner shall pay to Respondent for spousal support the sum of $500 per month for a period of six years from the date of this decree and thereafter the sum of $400 per month until further order of the court or until she dies.” Affirmed as modified.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re the Marriage of Mance. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
This is a dissolution of marriage case in which wife appeals those portions of the trial court’s decree which concern spousal support, child support, the property division and attorney fees. Husband cross-appeals with respect to the property division and attorney fees. We affirm all aspects of the decree save for that concerning spousal support; we agree with wife that her permanent spousal support should be increased. Accordingly, the first sentence of paragraph 9 of the decree is amended to read:
“9. Petitioner shall pay to Respondent for spousal support the sum of $500 per month for a period of six years from the date of this decree and thereafter the sum of $400 per month until further order of the court or until she dies.”
Affirmed as modified. Costs to appellant on appeal and cross-respondent on cross-appeal.