Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon
Dedman v. Albina Fuel Co.
Dedman v. Albina Fuel Co., 112 Or. App. 632 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1992-04-22
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM Plaintiff assigns error to the granting of defendant’s motion for judgment n.o.v., one of the grounds for which was that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict. The focus of plaintiffs argument on appeal is that there was supporting evidence. Plaintiffs designation of record does not include any part of the trial testimony or other evidence, except for selected exhibits. The record before us is not sufficient for us to review the assignment. Universal Ideas Corp. v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Dedman v. Albina Fuel Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
Plaintiff assigns error to the granting of defendant’s motion for judgment n.o.v., one of the grounds for which was that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict. The focus of plaintiffs argument on appeal is that there was supporting evidence. Plaintiffs designation of record does not include any part of the trial testimony or other evidence, except for selected exhibits. The record before us is not sufficient for us to review the assignment. Universal Ideas Corp. v. Esty, 84 Or App 541, 734 P2d 408 (1987).
Affirmed.