Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon
Allen v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
124 Or. App. 430
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1993-11-03
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision order that set his parole release date. ORS 144.335. He argues that the Board’s reliance on information that it refused to disclose to him violated his rights under Article I, sections 10 and 11, of the Oregon Constitution, and the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. In Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331, 862 P2d 1312 (1993), we decided the issues presented by petitioner contrary to his position, holding that the Board may deny petitioner access to certain information.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Allen v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision order that set his parole release date. ORS 144.335. He argues that the Board’s reliance on information that it refused to disclose to him violated his rights under Article I, sections 10 and 11, of the Oregon Constitution, and the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
In Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331, 862 P2d 1312 (1993), we decided the issues presented by petitioner contrary to his position, holding that the Board may deny petitioner access to certain information.
Petitioner’s other arguments do not require discussion.
Affirmed.