Opinion · Oregon Supreme Court
State v. Letterman
State v. Letterman, 291 Or. 3 (Or. 1981)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Oregon Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1981-05-05
- Topic
- general
627 P.2d 484 (1981) 291 Or. 3 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Larry Eugene LETTERMAN, Petitioner. No. 26407; CA 16726; SC 27314. Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued and Submitted February 5, 1981.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Letterman. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 11 opinions
627 P.2d 484 (1981) 291 Or. 3
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
No. 26407; CA 16726; SC 27314.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
Larry Eugene LETTERMAN, Petitioner.
No. 26407; CA 16726; SC 27314.
Supreme Court of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted February 5, 1981. Decided May 5, 1981.Marilyn C. McManus, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
Dale L. Anderson, Deputy Dist. Atty., Dallas, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.
Before DENECKE, C.J., and TONGUE, LENT, LINDE, PETERSON and TANZER, JJ.
Affirmed by an equally divided court.