Opinion · Oregon Supreme Court
State v. Jenkins
246 Or. 280
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Oregon Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Date
- 1967-03-15
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- supreme court had “no way of determining whether the exclusion” of defendant’s evidence was prejudicial, without an offer of proof
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Jenkins. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 16 opinions
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from a burglary conviction, contending that the court erred in excluding certain evidence.
No offer of proof was made and consequently, even *281 if the evidence was admissible, we have no way of determining whether the exclusion of the evidence was prejudicial to defendant.
The judgment is affirmed.