Opinion · Oregon Supreme Court

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Cornett

318 Or. 323

Type: Opinion
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Date: 1994-01-27
Topic: general

How later courts describe this case

“we must examine the facts to determine the particular child’s understanding” of the nature of a medical examination

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Cornett. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 6 opinions

review dismissed as improvidently allowed January 27, 1994

In the Matter of C. and K., Children. STATE ex rel JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Respondent on Review, v. James CORNETT and Shannon Huskey, Petitioners on Review, and Karin CORNETT, fka Karin Huskey, Respondent on Review. In the Matter of the Marriage of Shannon HUSKEY, Petitioner on Review, and Karin HUSKEY, nka Karin Cornett, Respondent on Review.

Michael A. Greenlick, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review James Cornett.

Peter Miller, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review Shannon Huskey.

*324 Janie M. Burcart, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review State ex rel Juvenile Department of Multnomah County. With her on the response to the petitions were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Michael C. Livingston, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

No appearance contra for respondent on review Karin Cornett, fka Karin Huskey.

No appearance contra for the children.