Opinion · Nylaw New York

YAMARONE v. DEMPSEY, 222 App. Div. 756 (1927)

ANTONIO YAMARONE, as Adm’r, Adm’x, etc., of GAETANO YAMARONE, Deceased,Appellant, v. CHARLES DEMPSEY & EVA DEMPSEY, Respondents., 222 A.D. 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1927)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1927-01-01
Topic: general

YAMARONE v. DEMPSEY, 222 App. Div. 756 (1927) ANTONIO YAMARONE, as Administrator, etc., of GAETANO YAMARONE, Deceased,Appellant, v. CHARLES DEMPSEY and EVA DEMPSEY, Respondents.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. December, 1927 Judgment, as amended, reversed upon the law and the facts and new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed YAMARONE v. DEMPSEY, 222 App. Div. 756 (1927). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

YAMARONE v. DEMPSEY,222 App. Div. 756(1927)

ANTONIO YAMARONE, as Administrator, etc., of GAETANO YAMARONE, Deceased,

Appellant, v. CHARLES DEMPSEY and EVA DEMPSEY, Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

December, 1927

Judgment, as amended, reversed upon the law and the facts and new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. This is an action to recover damages for the death of plaintiff's intestate. We are of opinion that the evidence adduced by plaintiff, unexplained by defendants, presented aprima faciecase of negligence upon the part of defendants. Young, Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Seeger, JJ., concur.