Opinion · Nylaw New York
WRIGHT v. WRIGHT, 173 App. Div. 966 (1916)
Mary R. Wright & Others, Respondents, v. Mary R. Wright & Others,Impleaded with N.Y. Pub. Libr., Astor, Lenox & TildenFoundations, a Corp., etc., Respondent, & Knickerbocker Hospital,Appellant., 173 A.D. 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1916)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1916-01-01
- Topic
- general
WRIGHT v. WRIGHT, 173 App. Div. 966 (1916) Mary R. Wright and Others, Respondents, v. Mary R.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed WRIGHT v. WRIGHT, 173 App. Div. 966 (1916). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
WRIGHT v. WRIGHT,173 App. Div. 966(1916)
Mary R. Wright and Others, Respondents, v. Mary R. Wright and Others,
Impleaded with New York Public Library, Astor, Lenox and Tilden
Foundations, a Corporation, etc., Respondent, and Knickerbocker Hospital,
Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
May, 1916.
Present — Clarke, P.J., Laughlin, Scott, Smith and Davis, JJ.