Opinion · Nylaw New York

WOLF v. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS RAILROAD COMPANY, 195 N.Y. 543 (1909)

JOHN WOLF, Respondent, v. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS R.R. COMPANY,Appellant., 88 N.E. 1135 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1909)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1909-04-27
Topic: general

WOLF v. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS RAILROAD COMPANY, 195 N.Y. 543 (1909) 88 N.E. 1135 JOHN WOLF, Respondent, v. THE BROOKLYN HEIGHTS RAILROAD COMPANY,Appellant.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued March 23, 1909 Decided April 27, 1909 D.A. Marsh and George D. Yeomans for appellant.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed WOLF v. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS RAILROAD COMPANY, 195 N.Y. 543 (1909). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

WOLFv. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS RAILROAD COMPANY,195 N.Y. 543(1909)

88 N.E. 1135

JOHN WOLF, Respondent,v. THE BROOKLYN HEIGHTS RAILROAD COMPANY,

Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued March 23, 1909

Decided April 27, 1909

D.A. MarshandGeorge D. Yeomansfor appellant.Robert StewartandRalph G. Barclayfor respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, WERNER and HISCOCK, JJ.Page 544