Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

WISNIEWSKI v. WEINSTOCK, 135 N.J.L. 202 (1947)

50 A.2d 894

Type
Opinion
Court
Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction
Njlaw
Date
1947-01-17
Topic
general

WISNIEWSKI v. WEINSTOCK, 135 N.J.L. 202 (1947) 50 A.2d 894 AGNES WISNIEWSKI, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM, ETC., APPELLANT, v. LOUISWEINSTOCK, RESPONDENT.Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted October 25, 1946 — Decided January 17, 1947. On appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported at 130 N.J.L. 58. For the appellant, Francis N.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed WISNIEWSKI v. WEINSTOCK, 135 N.J.L. 202 (1947). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

WISNIEWSKI v. WEINSTOCK,135 N.J.L. 202(1947)
50 A.2d 894
AGNES WISNIEWSKI, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM, ETC., APPELLANT, v. LOUIS
WEINSTOCK, RESPONDENT.
Court of Errors and Appeals.
Submitted October 25, 1946 —
Decided January 17, 1947.
On appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported at130 N.J.L. 58.
For the appellant,Francis N. Reps.

For the respondent,Philip Blacher.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.For affirmance— THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, COLIE, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McGEEHAN, McLEAN, JJ. 14.For reversal— None.