Opinion · Washington Court of Appeals Opinions
WHISTMAN v. W. AM. OF OHIO CAS. GROUP OF INS. CO., 37 Wn. App. 1080 (1984)
EARL WHISTMAN, ET AL, Respondents, v. W. Am. OF THE Ohio CASUALTYGROUP OF Ins. COMPANIES, Appellant., 37 Wash. App. 1080 (Wash. Ct. App. 1984)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Washington Court of Appeals Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Washington
- Date
- 1984-06-26
- Topic
- general
WHISTMAN v. W. AM. OF OHIO CAS. GROUP OF INS.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed WHISTMAN v. W. AM. OF OHIO CAS. GROUP OF INS. CO., 37 Wn. App. 1080 (1984). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
WHISTMAN v. W. AM. OF OHIO CAS. GROUP OF INS. CO.,37 Wn. App. 1080(1984)
EARL WHISTMAN, ET AL,Respondents,v. WEST AMERICAN OF THE OHIO CASUALTY
GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES,Appellant.
No. 5472-1-III.
The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.
June 26, 1984.
UNREPORTED OPINION
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grant County, No. 31053, James D. Kendall, J., entered October 22, 1982.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part,andremandedby unpublished opinion per McInturff, J., concurred in by Green, A.C.J., and Thompson, J. Now published at38 Wn. App. 580.
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩