Opinion · Nylaw New York
WEINBERGER v. KALMON DOLGIN, INC., 278 App. Div. 656 (1951)
HARRY M. WEINBERGER, as Assignee for the Benefit of Creditors of NEST-RITEBOX CO., INC., Respondent-Appellant, v. KALMON DOLGIN, INC.,Appellant-Respondent., 278 A.D. 656 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1951)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nylaw New York
- Jurisdiction
- Nylaw
- Date
- 1951-02-05
- Topic
- general
WEINBERGER v. KALMON DOLGIN, INC., 278 App. Div. 656 (1951) HARRY M. WEINBERGER, as Assignee for the Benefit of Creditors of NEST-RITEBOX CO., INC., Respondent-Appellant, v. KALMON DOLGIN, INC.,Appellant-Respondent.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed WEINBERGER v. KALMON DOLGIN, INC., 278 App. Div. 656 (1951). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
WEINBERGER v. KALMON DOLGIN, INC.,278 App. Div. 656(1951)
HARRY M. WEINBERGER, as Assignee for the Benefit of Creditors of NEST-RITE
BOX CO., INC., Respondent-Appellant, v. KALMON DOLGIN, INC.,
Appellant-Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
February 5, 1951.
Present — Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ.