Opinion · Oklaw Oklahoma

WEBER v. STATE, 17 Okla. Cr. 731 (1920)

189 P. 747

Type
Opinion
Court
Oklaw Oklahoma
Jurisdiction
Oklaw
Date
1920-06-30
Topic
general

WEBER v. STATE, 17 Okla. Cr. 731 (1920) 189 P. 747 W.F. (DUTCH) WEBER v. STATE.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed WEBER v. STATE, 17 Okla. Cr. 731 (1920). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

WEBER v. STATE,17 Okla. Cr. 731(1920)
189 P. 747
W.F. (DUTCH) WEBER v. STATE.
No. A-3554.
Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.
Opinion Filed June 30, 1920.
Appeal from District Court, Oklahoma County; Edward Dewes Oldfield, Judge.

W.F. (Dutch) Weber, convicted of grand larceny, appeals. Dismissed.
Pruiett, Sniggs Patterson for plaintiff in error.
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff in error, W.F. (Dutch) Weber, was convicted in the district court of Oklahoma county of the theft of one Ford five-passenger automobile, the property of C.E. Smith, and his punishment assessed at three years' imprisonment in the state penitentiary. From the judgment rendered, November 30, 1918, in pursuance of the verdict, he appealed by filing in this court on May 28, 1919, a petition in error with case-made. His counsel of record have this day moved the court to dismiss the appeal, which motion is sustained and the appeal herein dismissed, and the cause remanded to the trial court with directions to carry into immediate effect the judgment rendered in this cause. Mandate forthwith.