Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

WALLING v. WOLFERMAN, 144 F.2d 354 (8th Cir. 1944)

L. Metcalf WALLING, Adm’r, Adm’x of the Wage & Hour Div., UnitedStates Dep’t of Labor, Appellant, v. Fred WOLFERMAN, Inc. aCorporation., 144 F.2d 354 (8th Cir. 1944)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1944-10-02
Topic: general

WALLING v. WOLFERMAN, 144 F.2d 354 (8th Cir. 1944) L. Metcalf WALLING, Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, UnitedStates Department of Labor, Appellant, v. Fred WOLFERMAN, Inc. aCorporation. No. 12937.Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed WALLING v. WOLFERMAN, 144 F.2d 354 (8th Cir. 1944). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

WALLING v. WOLFERMAN,144 F.2d 354(8th Cir. 1944)

L. Metcalf WALLING, Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, United

States Department of Labor, Appellant, v. Fred WOLFERMAN, Inc. a

Corporation.

No. 12937.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

October 2, 1944.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri; Merrill E. Otis, Judge.

Douglas B. Maggs, Sol., Department of Labor, and Bessie Margolin, Asst. Sol., Department of Labor, both of Washington, D.C., and Reid Williams, Regional Atty., Department of Labor, of Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.

R.B. Caldwell and Blatchford Downing, both of Kansas City, Mo., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court,54 F. Supp. 917, dismissed without taxation of costs in favor of either of the parties in this court, on motion of appellant and approval of appellee.Page 354