Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

WALKER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 74 F.2d 1022 (9th Cir. 1935)

74 F.2d 1022

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1935-01-21
Topic: general

WALKER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 74 F.2d 1022 (9th Cir. 1935) R.M. WALKER, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. No. 7747.Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed WALKER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 74 F.2d 1022 (9th Cir. 1935). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

WALKER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,74 F.2d 1022(9th Cir. 1935)

R.M. WALKER, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 7747.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

January 21, 1935.

Petition to Review an Order of the United States Board of Tax Appeals.

O.R. Folsom-Jones, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Frank J. Wideman, Asst. U.S. Atty. Gen., and Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before WILBUR and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon motion of counsel for respondent, consented to by counsel for petitioner, ordered petition to review in this cause dismissed for failure of petitioner to file record and docket cause; mandate forthwith.Page 37