Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

UTILITIES HOLDING v. CITY OF OSCEOLA, IOWA, 63 F.2d 1020 (8th Cir. 1933)

UTILITIES HOLDING Corp., Appellant, v. CITY OF OSCEOLA, Iowa, etal., Appellees., 63 F.2d 1020 (8th Cir. 1933)

Type
Opinion
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1933-03-18
Topic
general

UTILITIES HOLDING v. CITY OF OSCEOLA, IOWA, 63 F.2d 1020 (8th Cir. 1933) UTILITIES HOLDING CORPORATION, Appellant, v. CITY OF OSCEOLA, IOWA, etal., Appellees. No. 9688.Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. March 18, 1933.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed UTILITIES HOLDING v. CITY OF OSCEOLA, IOWA, 63 F.2d 1020 (8th Cir. 1933). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
UTILITIES HOLDING v. CITY OF OSCEOLA, IOWA,63 F.2d 1020(8th Cir. 1933)
UTILITIES HOLDING CORPORATION, Appellant, v. CITY OF OSCEOLA, IOWA, et
al., Appellees.
No. 9688.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
March 18, 1933.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa; Chas. A. Dewey, Judge.
John N. Hughes, of Des Moines, Iowa (Donnelly, Lynch, Anderson Lynch, of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and Hughes, O'Brien Faville, of Des Moines, Iowa, on the brief), for appellant.

O.M. Slaymaker, of Osceola, Iowa (R.E. Killmar, of Osceola, Iowa, on the brief), for appellees.
Before KENYON, and SANBORN, Circuit Judges, and REEVES, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree of the District Court overruling an application of appellant, Utilities Holding Corporation, for a temporary injunction against appellees to restrain them from proceeding in a certain alleged action pending in the state court which attacks appellant's telephone rates and franchises in the city of Osceola, Iowa. We are satisfied the trial court committed no error in its ruling, and its order and decree is affirmed.Page 5