Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

U.S. v. TORMOS-VEGA, 912 F.2d 3 (1st Cir. 1990)

United States, APPELLEE, v. JOSE TORMOS-VEGA, DEFENDANT,APPELLANT.UNITED STATES OF Am., APPELLEE, v. JUAN LUIS BOSCIO, DEFENDANT,APPELLANT., 912 F.2d 3 (1st Cir. 1990)

Type
Opinion
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-09-05
Topic
general

U.S. v. TORMOS-VEGA, 912 F.2d 3 (1st Cir. 1990) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. JOSE TORMOS-VEGA, DEFENDANT,APPELLANT.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. JUAN LUIS BOSCIO, DEFENDANT,APPELLANT. Nos. 88-2235, 89-1253 and 89-2022.United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.Heard and Submitted April 5, 1990.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed U.S. v. TORMOS-VEGA, 912 F.2d 3 (1st Cir. 1990). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

U.S. v. TORMOS-VEGA,912 F.2d 3(1st Cir. 1990)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. JOSE TORMOS-VEGA, DEFENDANT,
APPELLANT.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. JUAN LUIS BOSCIO, DEFENDANT,
APPELLANT.
Nos. 88-2235, 89-1253 and 89-2022.
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
Heard and Submitted April 5, 1990.
Decided September 5, 1990.
Page 4
Harry Anduze Montano with whom Pia Gallegos was on brief, for defendant, appellant Jose Tormos-Vega.

Ricardo R. Pesquera, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Daniel F. Lopez-Romo, U.S. Atty., was on brief, for appellee U.S.

Juan Luis Boscio, on brief pro se.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico; Carmen C. Cerezo, District Judge.
Before BREYER, Chief Judge, CAMPBELL and SELYA, Circuit Judges.
LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge.
[1] The judgment of the district court is vacated and the case remanded for a new trial.Gomez v. United States,___ U.S. ___,109 S.Ct. 2237,104 L.Ed.2d 923(1989);United States v.Martinez-Torres,912 F.2d 1552(1st Cir. 1990) (en banc). In view of the Supreme Court's grant of certiorari inUnited States v.France,886 F.2d 223(9th Cir. 1989)cert. granted,___ U.S. ___,110 S.Ct. 1921,109 L.Ed.2d 285(1990), however, the mandate of this court ordering the foregoing is stayed until further order.See Martinez-Torres,at 1556.Page 517