Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

U.S. v. MINORE, 303 F.3d 1120 (9th Cir. 2002)

United States, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary William MINORE, akaSkip, Defendant-Appellant., 303 F.3d 1120 (9th Cir. 2002)

Type
Opinion
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2002-09-10
Topic
general

U.S. v. MINORE, 303 F.3d 1120 (9th Cir. 2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary William MINORE, akaSkip, Defendant-Appellant. No. 99-30381.United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. September 10, 2002.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed U.S. v. MINORE, 303 F.3d 1120 (9th Cir. 2002). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

U.S. v. MINORE,303 F.3d 1120(9th Cir. 2002)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary William MINORE, aka
Skip, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 99-30381.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
September 10, 2002.
Annette L. Hayes, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Lee Covell, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: B. FLETCHER and FISHER, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER,fn*Senior District Judge.
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny appellant's petition for rehearing. Judge Fisher voted to deny the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and Judge Fletcher and Judge Schwarzer recommended denial of the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed.R.App.P.35.

The petition for panel rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc, filed August 1, 2002, is DENIED.
  1. The Honorable William W. Schwarzer, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. ↩