Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
U.S. v. ALEXANDER, 353 Fed.Appx. 885 (5th Cir. 2009)
353 Fed.Appx. 885
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2009-11-23
- Topic
- general
U.S. v. ALEXANDER, 353 Fed.Appx. 885 (5th Cir. 2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tommy ALEXANDER, Sr.,Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-20056 Summary Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. November 23, 2009. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed U.S. v. ALEXANDER, 353 Fed.Appx. 885 (5th Cir. 2009). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
U.S. v. ALEXANDER,353 Fed.Appx. 885(5th Cir. 2009)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tommy ALEXANDER, Sr.,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-20056 Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 23, 2009.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Tommy Alexander, Sr., Lewisburg, PA, pro se.
Tommy Alexander, Sr., Lewisburg, PA, pro se.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, No. 4:89-CR-331-1.
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Tommy Alexander, Sr., federal prisoner # 07193-035, appeals the denial of his motion under FED.R.CRIM.P.32to correct the Presentence Report ("PSR"). Complaints regarding the contents of a PSR must be raised before imposition of sentence; therefore, the district court did not have jurisdiction to consider Alexander's post-sentence motion.See United States v.Engs,884 F.2d 894,895-97(5th Cir. 1989). The judgment is AFFIRMED on that alternative basis.See United States v.Early,27 F.3d 140,142(5th Cir. 1994).