Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

UNITED STATES v. DAY, 55 F.2d 1086 (2nd Cir. 1932)

United States ex rel. Vincenzo DIMARO, alias John Battaglia,Relator-Appellant, v. Benjamin M. DAY, Comm’r of Immigration at thePort of N.Y., Respondent-Appellee., 55 F.2d 1086 (2d Cir. 1932)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1932-02-15
Topic: general

UNITED STATES v. DAY, 55 F.2d 1086 (2nd Cir. 1932) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Vincenzo DIMARO, alias John Battaglia,Relator-Appellant, v. Benjamin M. DAY, Commissioner of Immigration at thePort of New York, Respondent-Appellee.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed UNITED STATES v. DAY, 55 F.2d 1086 (2nd Cir. 1932). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

UNITED STATES v. DAY,55 F.2d 1086(2nd Cir. 1932)

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Vincenzo DIMARO, alias John Battaglia,

Relator-Appellant, v. Benjamin M. DAY, Commissioner of Immigration at the

Port of New York, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 299.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

February 15, 1932.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

J. Waisman, of New York City (Harold Van Riper, of New York City, of counsel), for relator.

George Z. Medalie, U.S. Atty., of New York City (Morton Baum, Asst. U.S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed on the authority of U.S. ex rel. Gervasio Natali v. Day,45 F.2d 112(C.C.A. 2); U.S. ex rel. Karamian v. Curran,16 F.2d 958(C.C.A. 2); section 20 of the Immigration Act of 1917 (8 USCA § 156).