Opinion · Nylaw New York
ULTRAMAR COMPANY, LIMITED v. MINERALS SEPARATION, LTD., 236 N.Y. 636 (1923)
142 N.E. 315
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nylaw New York
- Jurisdiction
- Nylaw
- Date
- 1923-10-02
- Topic
- general
ULTRAMAR COMPANY, LIMITED v. MINERALS SEPARATION, LTD., 236 N.Y. 636 (1923) 142 N.E. 315 ULTRAMAR COMPANY, LIMITED, Respondent, v. MINERALS SEPARATION, LIMITED,Appellant, Impleaded with Others.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued October 1, 1923 Decided October 2, 1923 Lindell T. Bates for motion. Emil Goldmark opposed.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed ULTRAMAR COMPANY, LIMITED v. MINERALS SEPARATION, LTD., 236 N.Y. 636 (1923). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
ULTRAMAR COMPANY, LIMITEDv. MINERALS SEPARATION, LTD.,236 N.Y. 636(1923)
142 N.E. 315
ULTRAMAR COMPANY, LIMITED, Respondent,v. MINERALS SEPARATION, LIMITED,
Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Argued October 1, 1923
Decided October 2, 1923