Opinion · Nylaw New York

TROUTMAN v. STATE, 278 App. Div. 728 (1951)

RALPH TROUTMAN, Respondent, v. STATE OF N.Y., Appellant. (Claim No.28135.), 278 A.D. 728 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. 1951)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1951-03-14
Topic: general

TROUTMAN v. STATE, 278 App. Div. 728 (1951) RALPH TROUTMAN, Respondent, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant. (Claim No.28135.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed TROUTMAN v. STATE, 278 App. Div. 728 (1951). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

TROUTMAN v. STATE,278 App. Div. 728(1951)

RALPH TROUTMAN, Respondent, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant. (Claim No.

28135.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.

March 14, 1951.

Judgment reversed on the law and facts and the claim dismissed on the ground that no actionable damage against the State has been established.Page 729The court reverses findings of fact in the decision of the court below numbered 8 and 10 and affirms all other findings of fact. The court reverses the conclusions of law in the decision made in the court below. Foster, P.J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ., concur. [Seepost, p. 865.]